Mullett v. Morris
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Prairie Circuit Court, Southern. District; Eugene Lankford, Judge; STATEMENT BY THE COURT. This ¡suit was brought by appellant to collect $19.20, alleged to have been wrongfully required paid by him to the appellee who was court stenographer, for a transcript of the testimony in the case of Mullett v. Clarendon Electric Light é Ice Co., tried in the Monroe circuit court.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Prairie Circuit Court, Southern. District; Eugene Lankford, Judge; STATEMENT BY THE COURT. This ¡suit was brought by appellant to collect $19.20, alleged to have been wrongfully required paid by him to the appellee who was court stenographer, for a transcript of the testimony in the case of Mullett v. Clarendon Electric Light é Ice Co., tried in the Monroe circuit court. It is alleged that the reporter took the notes in shorthand, failed 'and refused to file a transcript thereof with the clerk of the circuit court as required by law, but instead sent the transcript by express to…
1Opinion of the Court
Kirby, J.,
(after stating the facts). Appellant contends that the court erred in not directing a verdict in his favor and that the verdict is contrary to the evidence.
The law provides for the appointment of an official stenographer by the circuit judge for each judicial circuit, who shall attend all terms of the circuit court and when requested by either party “make a stenographic report of all oral proceedings had in such court, including the testimony of witnesses with the questions to them, verbatim, the oral instructions of the court and any further proceedings or matter when directed by…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dozier v. Grayson-McLeod Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1898
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dyer & Co. v. Delight Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1919