Legal Opinion

Newlin v. Adair

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided October 2, 1912No. 99PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action Als. sci. fa. sur Judgment to the use of Harriet I. Newlin, administratrix de bonis non with will annexed of James B. Newlin, deceased, and Katie C. Phillips, Executrix of Emma A. Newlin, deceased, who was assignee of Julia A. P. Adair, against Robert Adair, administrator of Christopher B. Naudain, deceased, and others. On motion of defendants, made at the first term, that judgment be not given notwithstanding the affidavit of demand. Refused.

1Opinion of the Court

Pennewill, C. J.,

delivering the opinion of the court:

The affidavit of demand in the above-stated case is attacked on two grounds, viz.:

1. Because there is no averment in the affidavit that Harriet I. Newlin, the affiant, is the administratrix of James B. Newlin, deceased.

2. Because there is no averment in the affidavit that the affiant is the plaintiff in the action.

[1] In support of the first objection counsel for the defendants have cited the following Delaware cases, viz.: Blades Lumber Co. v. Kent & Weeks Lumber Co., 2 Marv. 302, 43 Atl. 174; St. Joseph’s Polish Catholic B. Society v. St.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Saint Joseph's Polish Catholic Beneficial Society v. Saint Hedwig's ChurchSuperior Court of Delaware · 1901
  2. Buker v. GibsonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1897

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jersawit v. BanningSuperior Court of Delaware · 1922
  2. Koury v. Claymont Development Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API