Legal Opinion

Meiergerd v. Qatalyst Corp.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 2024No. S-22-939Published

1Opinion of the Court

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 07/10/2024 06:08 PM CDT - 831 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 316 Nebraska Reports MEIERGERD V. QATALYST CORP. Cite as

316 Neb. 831

David Meiergerd, appellant, v. Qatalyst Corporation and Roland Pinto, appellees. ___ N.W.3d ___ Filed June 14, 2024. No. S-22-939. 1. Judgments. A judgment’s meaning is determined, as a matter of law, by the contents of the judgment in question. 2. Judgments: Appeal and Error. An appellate court independently reviews questions of law decided by a lower court. 3. Judgments. Unless the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Abbott v. AbbottNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Ashland State Bank v. Elkhorn Racquetball, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Ramaekers v. Creighton UniversityNebraska Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Sanford v. LundquistNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Zeiler v. ReifschneiderNebraska Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API