Legal Opinion

Oakford v. Oakford

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 12, 1963No. 63-671PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We are called upon to answer a question certified to us by the chancellor of the Circuit Court of Dade County pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 4.6, 31 F.S.A.

It appearing that the chancellor has already made judicial determination of the question, there is no basis for our entertaining the certified question. The attempted certification amounts to an interlocutory appeal. The certificate is denied. See Hunter v. Flowers, Fla.1949, 38 So.2d 438; Johnson v. Southeast Title and Insurance, Fla.App.1963, 148 So.2d 67; Prigger v. Kingery, Fla.App.1962, 144 So.2d 323.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Prigger v. KingeryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  2. Johnson v. Southeast Title & Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  3. Hunter v. FlowersSupreme Court of Florida · 1949

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Strowmatt v. Volunteer State Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  2. State Ex Rel. Sheppard v. DuvalDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  3. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. NeckmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975