Legal Opinion
Bentley v. County of Onondaga
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 2, 1963Published
1Opinion of the CourtRichard J. Cardamone, J.
An application under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act (now CPLR 7801 et seq.) has been made by the petitioners Town of Skaneateles, Town of Spaiford and the Village of Skaneateles, together with certain individual taxpayers residing within these municipalities, to set aside the actions of the respondent Board of Supervisors of Onondaga County, which included the above petitioners in the Onondaga County Water District.
The water district in question was established by the respondent Board of Supervisors pursuant to the provisions of article 5-A of the County Law (L. 1953, ch. 868, eft.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of City of Syracuse v. GibbsNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Cort v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Cort v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Wadsworth v. . Bd. of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Rochester Co-operative Milk Producers Bargaining Agency, Inc. v. Du MondNew York Supreme Court · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.