Legal Opinion
United States v. James Lauren Jarman
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 11, 1998No. 97-1677PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-appellant, James Lauren Jar-man, appeals his sentence imposed by the district court following his guilty plea under 18 U.S.C. § 922(o). The district court considered him a “prohibited person” pursuant to the United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual (“U.S.S.G.”) § 2K2.1(a)(4)(B). Jar-man argues that this was an erroneous determination that adversely affected his guideline range. Jarman also claims that the government improperly enhanced his base offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(l)(B) because he possessed between five to seven firearms. For…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. Alfredo PerezCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Harold G. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Mark Henry VincentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Lisa Gort-DidonatoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- United States v. Clifton L. CousinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Jennifer RiccardiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Luis Alberto Hernandez-FierrosCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Daniel BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Albert J. Desantis, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.