Wright v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR K. MILLER, Circuit Judge.
Eddie E. Wright, indicted for assault with intent to kill, was convicted of the included lesser offense of assault with a dangerous weapon. He appeals from the judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial. The sole ground urged for reversal is that the question whether he was insane when he shot and wounded his victim should have been, and was not, submitted to the jury.
The contention makes it necessary to examine the evidence somewhat in detail because, as this court said in the Tatum case, 1 upon which Wright relies,
“ * * * [T]he function of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tatum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Hamilton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- Saunders v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Robert Westerhausen, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
- Edward L. Smith v. United States of America, Wayman R. Cunningham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- Mario Balestreri v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Lebron v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- In re E. G. C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.