Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Citibank, South Dakota, N.A.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 2011No. DA 11-0188PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice McGRATH

¶1 Meril Curtis (Curtis) appeals from an order of the Fourth Judicial District Court, Missoula County, finding in favor of Citibank, South Dakota, N.A. (Citibank) on Citibank’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. We reverse and remand.

¶2 Curtis argues several issues, which we reframe as follows: Did the District Court err in determining that Curtis’ state law claims were preempted by the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), 15 U.S.C. §1681-168 lx?

PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND

¶3 The facts as set forth in Curtis’ Amended Complaint allege that in July 2008, Curtis’ house guest took…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Todd v. Associated Credit Bureau Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Firelight Meadows, LLC v. 3 RIVERS TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC.Montana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. D'ANGELO v. Wilmington Medical Center, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1981
  4. Ritter v. Bill Barrett Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2009

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Feller v. First Interstate Bancsystem, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Conway v. Benefis Health System, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API