Legal Opinion

State v. Meisler

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 5, 1974PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

128 N.J. Super. 307 (1974)

319 A.2d 790

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BY THE COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION, PLAINTIFF,

v.

LEO MEISLER AND ESTHER B. MEISLER, DEFENDANTS, AND ROGER WILCO, INC., DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

February 5, 1974.

Mr. Remo Croce for plaintiff State of New Jersey (Mr. George Kugler, Attorney General, attorney).

Mr. John B. Mariano for the defendants Meisler (Messrs. Wallace, Douglas and Mariano, attorneys).

DEVINE, J.S.C.

This is a condemnation action instituted by the State of New Jersey against Leo Meisler and Roger Wilco, Inc. Procedurally, defendant has…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rockaway v. DonofrioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
  2. State, by Com'r of Transp. v. SirisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
  3. STATE, BY COMM'R OF TRANSPORTATION v. HancockNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  4. STATE BY COMMISSIONER OF TRANSP. v. HancockNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  5. New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency v. MosesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API