Hozz v. Varga
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.
This is an appeal from orders discharging a receiver, directing the payment of all funds in his custody, and approving the receiver’s accounts.
Louis Hozz and his wife, Ettie Hozz, were the assignees of the beneficial interest of a deed of trust and the assignees of a note executed by Victor Varga. The deed of trust provided that upon default the beneficiary could personally or through a receiver appointed by the court take possession of the property, operate it, conduct the business (a motel), collect the rents and income and perform such acts as would be necessary to conserve the value…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Winslow v. Harold G. Ferguson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Purdy v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Piuma v. MinettiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- McLane v. Placerville & Sacramento Valley R.R.California Supreme Court · 1885
- Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- W. E. Erickson Construction, Inc. v. Congress-Kenilworth Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- Smith v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- County of Sacramento v. RawatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- County of Sacramento v. Rawat CA3California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Hilti, Inc. v. HML Development Corp.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2007