Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Kirk v. Curry

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1925No. Nos. 5349-5355 inclusivePublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Woods, Judge:

The relators, seven in number, were Republican candidates for various municipal offices of the town of Rermit at the election held in that town on the first day of January, 1925. The respondents, constituting the common council and ex officio the board of canvassers of said town, refused to canvass the returns of the election and to declare the result thereof. The relators therefore file their several petitions for writs of mandamus to compel respondents to convene as a board of canvassers, to canvass the returns, and to declare and certify the election of relators to their…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Heironimus v. Town of DavisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. State ex rel. Westfall v. BlairWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. State Ex Rel. Gay v. City of BuckhannonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bannister v. Town of GlasgowWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. State v. MarcotteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
  3. State Ex Rel. Hicks v. LangfordWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. State ex rel. Woofter v. Town of ClayWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API