Legal Opinion
Lockhart v. Hofstra University
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 18, 2005No. 04-2290PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of said district court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.
Plaintiff-Appellant Lindbirgh Lockhart appeals from a March 29, 2004 judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Arlene R. Lindsay, Magistrate Judge) granting summary judgment to defendant-appellee Hofstra University. On appeal, Lockhart argues that the district court erred when it concluded that Lockhart could not establish a prima facie case for discrimination based on race in violation of Title VII of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jose GOENAGA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARCH OF DIMES BIRTH DEFECTS FOUNDATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Stephanie J. QUINN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GREEN TREE CREDIT CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Yerdon v. HenryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Okemo Mountain, Inc. v. United States Sporting Clays Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sethi v. NarodDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Durant v. Yale UniversityDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
- Herman v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023