Legal Opinion
United States v. Lazanda Moore
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 2, 2006No. 04-2989PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD, Circuit Judge.
The practice of favoring close family members or friends with lucrative government contracts is hardly a new one, but, at least in modern times, it is usually forbidden. This case involves a variant of that story, in which a jury found defendant LaZanda Moore guilty of violating 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(1), by participating in a scheme to conceal a material fact from the City of Milwaukee (the City), which in turn was receiving federal monies from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). In urging that her conviction should be overturned, Moore argues primarily…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- McBoyle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. WebberCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. John NataleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- United States v. SorichCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. WantuchCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.