Byrum v. Stockton Combined Harvester & Agricultural Works
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Stanislaus County refusing to grant a change of venue. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Temple, C.
Appeal from an order refusing a change of venue. The plaintiff resides in Stanislaus County, where the action was brought, and is a farmer. He purchased from defendant a Sliippee combined harvester, which, as he avers, defendant guaranteed would do good and satisfactory work, but which wholly failed to perform as guaranteed, by reason whereof he was damaged.
*658Defendant moved for a change of venue to San Joaquin County, upon an affidavit showing that the principal place of business of defendant is in Stockton, San Joaquin County, and that the contract sued upon was made at defendant’s…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Gas Appliance Sales Co. v. W. B. Bastian Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
- Clary v. Basalt Rock Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1950
- Bancroft v. San Francisco Tool Co.California Supreme Court · 1897