Legal Opinion
International Union of Operating Engineers
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided June 17, 2011No. C.A. No. 09-cv-11607-MAPPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AND THE COURT’S FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOLLOWING NON-JURY TRIAL (Dkt. No. 51)
PONSOR, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This is an action arising under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) to recover delinquent fringe benefit contributions allegedly owed to Plaintiffs under a collective bargaining agreement. This court conducted a three-day bench trial on February 22, 23, and 28 of this year. The memorandum below will first address Defendant’s Motion to Enforce a Settlement (Dkt. 51),…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Transportation-Communication Employees Union v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Fashion House, Inc. v. K Mart Corporation, Fashion House, Inc. v. K Mart CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Uno Restaurants, Inc. v. Boston Kenmore Realty Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Smart v. Gillette Co. Long-Term Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Joan C. Burnham, Etc. v. The Guardian Life Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ray Haluch Gravel Co. v. Cent. Pension Fund of the Int'l Union of Operating Eng'rs & Participating Emp'rsSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Intl. Union of Op. Engr. v. Ray Haluch GravelDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011