Samita Bhandary v. Agradoot Ghatak, et al.

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SAMITA BHANDARY, Case No. 26-cv-03177-PCP 8 Plaintiff, ORDER SCREENING COMPLAINT 9 v. AND DENYING REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL 10 AGRADOOT GHATAK, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 10, 11 Defendants. 11 12 Pro se plaintiff Samita Bhandary is proceeding in forma pauperis—that is, without having 13 paid the Court’s usual filing fee. As required by 28 U.S.C § 1915(e)(2), the Court previously 14 screened her complaint and dismissed it for failure to state any claim for relief over which the 15 Court has subject-matter…