Legal Opinion

Munn v. Herriff

Wood County Court of Common Pleas

Decided November 30, 1937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By CONN, J.

The issues now before the court are raised on defendant’s motion to strike certain allegations from the petition on the ground that the several averments sought to be stricken do not charge a negligent act under the circumstances set forth in plaintiff’s petition. The issues raised by the motion have been submitted on briefs of counsel.

Under the Code of Civil Procedure it is incumbent on the plaintiff to plead ultimate facts in a clear and eoncise manner and as well, to avoid the pleading of legal conclusions, or irrelevant or inconsistent matter. "Whether or not a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Potter v. GilmoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Uccello v. Interstate Truck Service, Inc.Trumbull County Court of Common Pleas · 1954
  2. Sours v. SoursTuscarawas County Court of Common Pleas · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API