Legal Opinion

State v. Dachtler

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1920No. File No. 4701PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Circuit Court, Meade 'County. Hon. James McNenny, Judge. Information by the State against 'William Daohtler. ' On motion to dismiss appeal to Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOY, P. J.

[1, 2] The motion to dismiss appeal should be denied. The fact that in criminal cases the original record is sent up to this "court in all cases does not change the rule as to the substance statements that should be contained in the briefs. The brief of appellant states that defendant was duly informed against, which is sufficient where the appellant in no manner questions the sufficiency of the information. No question is raised as to any alleged irregularity occurring on the trial. The only :q|uestion raised by the assignments of error relate to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hepner v. WheatleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  2. State ex rel. Curtis v. PoundSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. DachtlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API