Legal Opinion

PAO Severstal v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided April 25, 2017No. 16-00172Published

1Opinion of the Court

Slip Op. 17-50 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE PAO SEVERSTAL and SEVERSTAL EXPORT GMBH, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Before: Gary S. Katzmann, Judge Defendant, Court No. 16-00172 and ARCELORMITTAL USA LLC, AK STEEL CORPORATION, NUCOR CORPORATION, and UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, Defendant-Intervenors. OPINION [Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is granted. Plaintiffs’ Complaint is dismissed without prejudice.] Dated: April 25, 2017 Daniel J. Cannistra and Benjamin Blase Caryl, Crowell & Moring LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs. Renee A. Burbank, Trial Attorney,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API