Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. McClelland

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 21, 1922No. 3827PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Circuit Judge.

The appellants sought the leave of the District Court to file a petition or bill of intervention in a cause previously brought therein. The appellees, who were parties to said cause, objected in writing to the granting of such leave on the ground that the court had—

“no jurisdiction, because the purported intervention is not ancillary, but is original, and no federal question exists, nor does there exist the requisite diversity of citizenship, and this court therefore has not jurisdiction of the matters and things attempted to be presented by the said purported bill of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. JahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Herndon-Carter Co. v. James N. Norris, Son & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Great Northern Ry. Co. v. Blaine CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
  4. Knisely v. BurtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1918
  5. Nickels v. Pullman Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hoffman v. McClellandSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API