Sadowsky v. Levine
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Dissent
PEARSON, TILLMAN, Chief Judge
(dissenting).
The conclusion which I have reached in this case is contrary to that reached by the majority. While I recognize the strong *777possibility that their reasoning is correct, I must respectfully dissent and briefly set out my reasons.
The general rule which I find applicable is that if the lessee-knows the common approaches to his apartment have been made dangerous for use by the lessor’s failure to perform his duty to maintain them in a safe condition, the lessee’s knowledge of the dangerous condition will not put him in contributory fault as a matter of law…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. WylieSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
- Soper v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Welch v. MoothartSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- Karen Gardens, Inc. v. WalenSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Keating v. MottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904