Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sadowsky v. Levine

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 30, 1961No. 61-111Published

1Dissent

PEARSON, TILLMAN, Chief Judge

(dissenting).

The conclusion which I have reached in this case is contrary to that reached by the majority. While I recognize the strong *777possibility that their reasoning is correct, I must respectfully dissent and briefly set out my reasons.

The general rule which I find applicable is that if the lessee-knows the common approaches to his apartment have been made dangerous for use by the lessor’s failure to perform his duty to maintain them in a safe condition, the lessee’s knowledge of the dangerous condition will not put him in contributory fault as a matter of law…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. WylieSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  2. Soper v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. Welch v. MoothartSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  4. Karen Gardens, Inc. v. WalenSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  5. Keating v. MottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API