Legal Opinion
Ravagnan v. One Ninety Realty Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 21, 2009PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Wilma Guzman, J.), entered October 2, 2008, which, insofar as appealed from, denied the motions of defendants One Ninety Realty Company (190) and L’Occitane, Inc. (L’Occitane) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims as against them, or, in the alternative, for summary judgment on their cross claims against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (Con Ed) for common-law indemnification, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs and the motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Robinson v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Masucci-Matarazzo v. HoszowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Matas v. Clark & Wilkins Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
3Cited by12 opinions
- Dunson v. Riverbay Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Moore v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Alamo v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Alamo v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Baez v. 1749 Grand Concourse LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.