Navasie v. Hopi Tribe
Hopi Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
OPENING STATEMENT
Appellant seeks reversal of his conviction for abduction and child molesting. The issue addressed on this appeal is whether appellant was denied a fair trial due to ineffective counsel.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Appellant Nathan Navasie, a Hopi Indi-an, was a volunteer wrestling coach at Hopi Junior/Senior High School. Appellant drove alleged victim R. H., aged 14 years, and four other children home after *329school in his private vehicle on February 6, 1998. Criminal Complaint (C.C.) at 1. Appellant drove past the alleged victim’s home after dropping off…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. NashArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Ralph R. Tom v. William Sutton, Jailor, Whatcom CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Ronald AppoloneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Kenneth CRANDELL, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Bill J. BUNNELL, Warden; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hopi Tribe v. ChimericaHopi Appellate Court · 2004
- Duwala v. Hopi TribeHopi Appellate Court · 2005