Legal Opinion

Sandoz Chemical Works v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 17, 1925No. 2378PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Board of General Appraisers, reversing the judgment of a single general appraiser in the reappraisement of imported merchandise known as pyrazalon, which is a coal tar intermediate used in the manufacture of a fast light-yellow dye.

One of the assignments of error by the appellant is that the board failed to set forth the facts upon which its finding was based, as provided by section 501 of the tariff act of 1922.

*513The pertinent part of Section 501 is as follows:. Sec. 501. * * * Every such application shall be assigned by'the Board of General Appraisers…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kuttroff, Pickhardt & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sandoz Chemical Works v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. Downing v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API