First Nat. Bank v. Nee
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
REEVES, Chief Judge.
On August 19, 1949, a memorandum opinion on the merits of the case was filed in the above cause. 85 F.Supp. 840. On the same day a judgment denying recovery was filed in conformity with the opinion. Counsel for plaintiff has submitted a motion to amend the court’s findings, to make additional findings and to amend judgment, supplemented with additional briefs; ■and, in an oral argument, earnestly contended that the opinion and judgment in said case were erroneous and that the plaintiff was entitled to the relief originally sought in its complaint.
Able counsel particularly…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Detroit Edison Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Friend v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
- Reisinger v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Detroit Edison Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- Pearson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- World Publishing Company v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- First Nat. Bank of Kansas City v. NeeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1951