Legal Opinion

Haysville State Bank v. Hauserman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 5, 1979No. 49,623PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McFarland, J.:

This is an appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of defendant Daleen Marie Hauserman (hereinafter referred to as Daleen). Plaintiff Haysville State Bank (hereinafter referred to as Bank) appeals.

The complex factual situation will be simplified as much as possible. The parents of Daleen were engaged in farming and owned certain farm land. Prior to all events herein, they conveyed the real estate to their son, who in turn conveyed it to his sister, Daleen. On August 2, 1971, the parents were indebted to the plaintiff Bank in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stock v. NordhusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  2. Kauffman v. KebertDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Kearney v. A'HearnDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. MaishCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
  2. Mendenhall v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1992
  3. Jorge Construction Co. v. Weigel Excavating & Grading Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  4. Banister v. CarnesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1983
  5. Loving v. Federal Land Bank of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API