Legal Opinion

State v. Mundo-Parra

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided March 27, 2020No. 118875PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

No. 118,875 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. JOSE J. MUNDO-PARRA, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Postconviction discovery sought by the defendant should be allowed when the defendant shows that it is necessary to protect substantial rights. To get discovery, the defendant must make a good-cause showing by identifying the specific subject matter for discovery and explaining why discovery about those matters is necessary to protect substantial rights. 2. An appellate court reviews the district court's ruling on a request for postconviction…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bracy v. GramleySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. State v. MarshallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  3. Rodriguez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  4. In re the Personal Restraint GentryWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. Azad Haji AbdullahIdaho Supreme Court · 2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. ButlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  2. State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  3. State v. MarksSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
  4. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021
  5. State v. ButlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API