Legal Opinion

Easterly v. Wildman

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 31, 1924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWest, J.

This a suit in equity on a promissory note. The defendant makers of the note are H. F. Wildman and J. E. Easterly, co-partners doing business'under the firm name of Brevard Construction Company, Dorothea Wild-man, complainant payee, is the wife of Defendant EL F. Wildman, who made no defense to the suit and a decree pro confesso was in due course entered against him. Defendant J. El. Easterly filed an answer to the bill of complaint. Several paragraphs of this answer upon motion were stricken. From the order granting the motion to strike this appeal was taken. The order appealed from is…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Johns v. BowdenSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
  2. National Surety Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  3. Tampa & Jacksonville Railway Co. v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
  4. Canal Lumber Co. v. Florida Naval Stores & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1922
  5. Johnson v. ElliottSupreme Court of Florida · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Atlantic Shores Corp. v. ZetterlundSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  2. Ponce De Leon Fountain of Youth Co. v. DaySupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  3. Zetrouer v. ZetrouerSupreme Court of Florida · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API