Legal Opinion

City of Amarillo v. Loden

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 11, 1929No. 3330PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRandolph, J.

The city of Amarillo, as plaintiff, brought this suit for the use and ¡benefit of Willmering & Mullen against L. G. Loden, to recover judgment for certain pavement work done by them and to foreclose a pavement lien for the pavement of West Sixth street in front of lot 10 in block 65, in the Glidden & Sanborn addition to the city of Amarillo. Later Willmering & Mullen filed their plea of intervention, adopting the allegations of plaintiff’s petition. L. G. Loden filed his answer, which is not necessary to set out to any great extent. The plaintiff’s original petition was filed October 24, 1923.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vasser v. City of LibertyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  2. J. S. Brown Hardware Co. v. MarwitzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Majeski v. Estate of Majeski, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
  2. Long Bell Lumber Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  3. Real Estate Land Title & Trust Co. v. BeryleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Walker v. Texas Mexican Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Canales v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API