Legal Opinion
State v. Tiger
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided March 19, 2021No. 122692Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 122,692 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. PIDY TIGER, Appellant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Appeal from Sedgwick District Court; JEFFREY SYRIOS, judge. Opinion filed March 19, 2021. Affirmed. Pidy Tiger, appellant pro se. Matt J. Maloney, assistant county attorney, Marc Bennett, district attorney, and Derek Schmidt, attorney general, for appellee. Before GARDNER, P.J., SCHROEDER, J., and WALKER, S.J. PER CURIAM: Pidy Tiger appeals the district court's summary dismissal of his K.S.A. 60-1507 motions as successive and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.