K.M. v. Alabama Department of Youth Services
District Court, M.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
These consolidated cases are now before the court on defendant Peter Aseme’s motion for summary judgment filed pursuant to Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which provides that summary judgment is appropriate where “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and ... the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”
For the reasons that follow, the court concludes that the summary-judgment motion should be denied.
I. Introduction
Plaintiffs K.M., C.B., T.A.B., and K.T. bring these consolidated cases against the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Ex Parte CranmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Armstrong Business Services, Inc. v. AmSouth BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wilborn v. SOUTHERN UNION STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGEDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2010
- Gregg v. Ohio Department of Youth ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2009
- Dates v. Frank Norton, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2016
- Thompson v. City of BirminghamDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2014
- Palmer v. Infosys Technologies Ltd.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.