Huerta v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SLEET, Judge.
•Abel Alonso Huerta appeals the summary denial of his timely amended Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief as facially insufficient. We reverse the postconviction court’s order and remand for consideration of the motion on its. merits because Huerta’s motion stated a facially sufficient claim for relief under Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010).
To state a facially sufficient claim for postconviction relief, a movant must allege “that counsel’s performance was deficient [and] ... that the deficient…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Hernandez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
- Cano v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- YINETTE MARIA NUNEZ v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021