Legal Opinion

Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. Menke

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 27, 1932No. 534PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLloyd, J.

According to an annotation on page 282 following the opinion of the court in Insley v Webb, 41 A.L.R., 274, the weight of authority holds that such an extension of time of payment operates as such release; and on page 285 thereof Ohio is listed among the states that adhere to the contrary or minority rule. Similar statements of the law are found in annotations to Gilliam v McLemore, 43 A.L.R., 79 and Zastrow v Knight, 72 A.L.R., 379. The rule in Ohio is stated in Teeters v Lamborn, 43 Oh St, 144, the second syllabus whereof reads as follows:

“A debtor who has given a note secured by a mortgage…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zastrow v. KnightSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Gilliam v. McLemoreMississippi Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Insley v. WebbWashington Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Earp v. LillyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1905
  2. Washer v. TontarOhio Court of Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API