Legal Opinion

Rushing v. City of Baton Rouge

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 20, 1997No. 96 CA 1601PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I2FOGG, Judge.

The issue raised on appeal herein is whether the longevity benefits provided to firemen pursuant to LSA-R.S. 33:1992 B extend for a seventeen-year period or a twenty-year period. The trial court determined that those benefits continue for a twenty-year period. For the following reasons, we affirm.

The parties herein stipulated to the following facts:

1. On September 20, 1976 a suit was filed in the 19th Judicial District Court entitled Ronald J. Spillman v. the City of Baton Rouge. The suit was certified a class action.

2. The plaintiffs herein, all employees of the Baton Rouge…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Touchard v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  2. Garrett v. Seventh Ward General Hosp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
  3. Green v. Louisiana Underwriters Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  4. State v. RandallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
  5. Johnston v. Morehouse Parish Police JuryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. New Orleans Firefighters Local 632 v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. Smith v. ST. TAMMANY FIRE PROTECTION DIST. NO. 1.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API