Rushing v. City of Baton Rouge
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
I2FOGG, Judge.
The issue raised on appeal herein is whether the longevity benefits provided to firemen pursuant to LSA-R.S. 33:1992 B extend for a seventeen-year period or a twenty-year period. The trial court determined that those benefits continue for a twenty-year period. For the following reasons, we affirm.
The parties herein stipulated to the following facts:
1. On September 20, 1976 a suit was filed in the 19th Judicial District Court entitled Ronald J. Spillman v. the City of Baton Rouge. The suit was certified a class action.
2. The plaintiffs herein, all employees of the Baton Rouge…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Touchard v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Garrett v. Seventh Ward General Hosp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
- Green v. Louisiana Underwriters Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
- State v. RandallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
- Johnston v. Morehouse Parish Police JuryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- New Orleans Firefighters Local 632 v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
- Smith v. ST. TAMMANY FIRE PROTECTION DIST. NO. 1.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1998