Commonwealth v. Hoffman
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Pbice, J.,
Appellant was indicted for maliciously soliciting and inciting another person to commit sodomy.1 However, in his charge to the jury at the conclusion of the trial, the trial judge charged on the crime of assault and solicitation to commit sodomy. Appellant was then convicted of the crime as charged by the judge, and later sentenced for it.
We are concerned that a person could be indicted for one offense and convicted of another entirely different crime.2 An examination of the indictment form reveals that the crime listed on the back cover is at odds with the crime actually…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. WadleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SteinbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. HoffmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Smith v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth Dept. of Transportation v. Lambros, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.