Legal Opinion

Otero v. Otero

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1907No. Civil No. 990PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Third Judicial District, in and for the County of Maricopa. Edward Kent, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtNave, J.

— Mrs. Otero brought suit against Joseph J. Otero and W. K. James to quiet title to real estate. Prom a judgment in favor of defendants, she has appealed.

The assignments of error are directed at a ruling of the. court excluding from evidence an order of the probate court of Maricopa county offered in evidence by the plaintiff. • The instrument so rejected has not been brought before us by the record. This point is raised by counsel for the appellees as an objection to our consideration of the assignments of error. Counsel for the appellant and counsel for the appellees have each failed to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bronson v. SchultenSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Beckett v. SeloverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Veach v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Goodwin v. SimsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  5. Smith v. HaugerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harris v. GraysonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. Estate of Ralph v. KeleherArizona Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API