Legal Opinion
Romaine v. Colonial Tanning Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 2, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLahtinen, J.
Appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court (Sise, J.), entered February 6, 2002 in Fulton County, which partially denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, and (2) from an order of said court, entered June 5, 2002 in Fulton County, which denied defendant Colonial Tanning Corporation’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
In early 1994, defendant William Studenic, the president and apparent sole shareholder of defendant Colonial Tanning Corporation (hereinafter the corporation), discussed with plaintiff, who had worked for the corporation for two years, a proposal…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cron v. Hargro Fabrics, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
- D & N Boening, Inc. v. Kirsch Beverages, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Coppola v. CoppolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by3 opinions
- Manhattan Motorcars, Inc. v. Automobili LamborghiniDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Moon v. MoonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Gizara v. New York Times Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011