Monka v. State Conservation Commission

Plaintiffs contend that ch. 278, Laws of 1925— sec. 29.33 (7) (c),—is unconstitutional because it is a local act and does not express the subject in the title as is required by sec. 18, art. IV, Const., which is as follows:

“No private or local bill which may be passed by the legislature shall embrace more than one subject, and that shall be expressed in the title.”

The title of ch. 278, Laws of 1925, is as follows:

“An act to amend the introductory portion of paragraph (c) of subsection (7) of section 29.33 of the statutes, relating to net fishing in outlying waters.”

Plaintiffs contend that ch.…