Bunn Enterprises, Inc. v. Ohio Operating Engineers Fringe Benefit Programs
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
ALGENON L. MARBLEY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ 1 Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 33). Defendants seek summary judgment on all claims by all Plaintiffs,2 as well as on all counterclaims, on the grounds that the language of the Collective Bargaining Agreement (“CBA”) requires fringe benefit contributions to be made for all hours paid to all employees, without distinction to whether the work is “covered work” under the CBA. Plaintiffs respond that the Court’s prior cases misconstrue the CBA, and Sixth Circuit precedent, and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Shirley J. MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOLEDO HOSPITAL, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Clarence Erwin Copeland v. Mark MacHulis James StephensCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Total Benefits Planning Agency, Inc. v. Anthem Blue Cross & Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Vincent C. Wiley v. United States of America Citizens Federal Mortgage Corporation State of Ohio Franklin County Treasurer and Houng ThaiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wilson v. Bridge Overlay Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2015