Bernstein v. Carmichael
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtMurchie, C. J.
These two actions, tried together in the Superior Court, are brought forward for review on exceptions to the direction of verdicts for the defendant. The issue thus raised must be resolved, as the plaintiffs assert, by viewing all the evidence in the record in the light most favorable to them, Lewiston Trust Co. v. Deveno, 145 Me. 224, 74 A. (2nd) 457, and cases cited therein, with full rec ognition that a jury, when a case is submitted to it, is entitled to draw all inferences that are reasonable and proper from such evidence. That they áre limited to such inferences is undoubted. See the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Connor v. GilesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1884
- Nadeau v. PerkinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1937
- Beaulieu v. Portland Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1860
- Mahan v. HinesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921
- Lewiston Trust Co. v. DevenoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Cyr v. GiesenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1954
- Jordan v. Portland Coach Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1954
- Manchester v. DuganSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968
- Crockett v. StaplesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
- Glazier v. TetraultSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.