Legal Opinion

Safety Rail Source, LLC v. Bilco Co.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided April 8, 2009No. Civil 06-5598 (JBS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SIMANDLE, District Judge:

I. INTRODUCTION

This patent lawsuit centers around United States Patent No. 6,467,230 (the “'230 patent”), an “invention relating] to an interconnection device and method for securing a safety rail ... to the frame of an access hatch.” (Def.’s Br. Ex. A (“'230 patent”), col. 1,1. 6-10.) Plaintiff filed this lawsuit against Defendant, asserting that a device made and sold by Defendant — the Bil-Guard Hatch Rail system (the “Bil— Guard”) — infringed on the '230 patent, and Defendant filed a counterclaim, arguing that the '230 patent is invalid.

Presently before the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  4. Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  5. Ccs Fitness, Inc. v. Brunswick Corporation and Its Division Life FitnessCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
  2. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Technical Consumer Products, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API