United States v. Woods
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
2Per curiam
Appellant was tried by a general court-martial consisting of a military judge alone. Contrary to his pleas, he was found guilty of possessing lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), in violation of Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 892. These findings and the sentence to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for 13 months, total forfeitures, and reduction to E-l were approved by the convening authority. The Court of Military Review affirmed. This Court granted review to consider whether the military judge erred in refusing to admit the…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Medical Therapy Sciences, Inc., and Stanley BermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Napoleon B. LechocoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- United States v. EverageUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
- United States v. AllardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
4Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. AbdirahmanNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2008
- United States v. RyanU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
- United States v. HawleyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. VarelaU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1986