Legal Opinion · Dissent

Tagle v. Jakob

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 17, 2000Published

1DissentSpain, J.

We respectfully dissent. Although defendant Donna Jakob (hereinafter defendant) may not have an obligation as the property owner to repair the defective condition created by the electric company’s use of the easement, we do not believe — under these circumstances — that the property owner was relieved of all responsibility for the safety of visitors.

*575In Basso v Miller (40 NY2d 233), the Court of Appeals established “[t]he single standard of reasonable care under the circumstances whereby foreseeability shall be a measure of liability” (id., at 241). Here, although the dangerous condition was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Basso v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Kush v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Scurti v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Coote v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. Dart v. SolomonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API