Harrison v. Goldstein
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
This is an action of trespass for personal injuries. The trial resulted in a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of one thousand dollars. The evidence was conflicting as to the right of the plaintiff to recover anything, but it indicated that the injuries of the plaintiff were of a serious character. The plaintiff made a motion for a new trial, upon the ground that the verdict ivas inadequate. The learned judge who tried the case was of opinion that if the plaintiff was entitled to recover anything the damages awarded by the jury were inadequate and granted a new trial, which action…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Schwartz v. JaffeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Hilkirk v. HughesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Bachman v. Covington, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County1939
- Setlock v. Cohick, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1933