Legal Opinion

Kleidon v. City of Hickory Hills

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 16, 1983No. 82-2346PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mejda

Plaintiffs, owners of three homes whose lots adjoin two residential lots (the subject property), appeal from an order which declared valid a use variation ordinance allowing defendants to develop the subject property for off-site parking and which order denied plaintiffs their attorney fees and awarded costs to defendants. Plaintiffs also appeal the denial of their motion for reconsideration and other relief. We affirm.

Plaintiffs raise the following issues on appeal: (1) whether Ordinance No. 81 — 14 was adopted in accordance with proper procedures; (2) whether the variation ordinance relates…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. La Salle National Bank v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Pioneer Trust & Savings Bank v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  3. La Salle National Bank v. City of EvanstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Bennett v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Tomasek v. City of Des PlainesIllinois Supreme Court · 1976

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Hawthorne v. Village of Olympia FieldsIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Glenview State Bank v. Village of DeerfieldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. Lapp v. Village of WinnetkaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  4. Homeowners Organized to Protect the Environment, Inc. v. First National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. Westwood Forum, Inc. v. City of SpringfieldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API