Legal Opinion

United States v. Manzanilla-De-Jesus

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 12, 1981No. S 80 Cr. 693 (RWS)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Defendant Jesus Nunez-Tapia (“Nunez”) moves to suppress physical evidence and statements obtained by law enforcement authorities following his arrest on October 14, 1980 on charges relating to the armed hijacking of a tractor-trailer earlier that day. An evidentiary hearing was held on December 9 and 16. The following, pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 12(e), constitutes the court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. For the reasons stated hereunder, the motion to suppress physical evidence is denied. The motion to suppress statements is granted in part and denied…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. BaezCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1986
  2. United States v. GueveraDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1984
  3. United States ex rel. Dove v. ThieretDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1988
  4. United States v. HunyadyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
  5. United States v. Nunez-TapiaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API