R. H. Swartz Co. v. Minnesota Mut. Life Ins.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtPleasants, C. J.
This suit' was brought by appellant against appellee to recover the sum of $113.75, the purchase price of office supplies sold and delivered by appellant to J. E. Wilson, general agent of the appellant at Houston, Tex. The appellee answered in the court below by general denial, and special denial of the authority of J. B. Wilson to purchase the supplies for appel-lee’s account. Appellant pleaded, both express and implied authority in Wilson to make the purchase, and also pleaded that the appellee was estopped to deny the authority of Wilson to purchase the goods because such supplies were,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Manhattan Life Ins. Co. v. StubbsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- Sealy Oil Mill & Mfg. Co. v. Bishop Mfg. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- Booker-Jones Oil Co. v. National Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Hartford Life & Annuity Insurance v. Hayden's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1890
- Chapin v. FordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Desdemona Gasoline Co. of Texas v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- F. H. Woodruff & Sons, Inc. v. SchusterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
- Transcontinental Oil Co. v. WoffordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928