Legal Opinion
Arnold v. Maine State Highway Commission
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided November 11, 1971PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHIBALD, Justice.
On appeal by the defendant. The plaintiffs (Arnolds) own real estate in Water-ville at the interchange of two major highways, Kennedy Memorial Drive and Interstate 95. The State of Maine took by eminent domain the access rights of the plaintiffs to Kennedy Memorial Drive, thereby depriving them of all their frontage on the Drive, this being the last ninety feet (90') on the northerly side of the Drive prior to its intersection with Interstate 95.
Following proper procedures in such cases, the matter reached the Superior Court and was tried before a jury on the sole issue of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. CERTAIN PARCELS OF LAND, ETC.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Watson v. Milwaukee & Madison Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
- Brush Hill Development, Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Morrissey v. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Robards v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Merrill Trust Co. v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Weekley v. Town of ScarboroughSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Marc B. Terfloth v. Town of ScarboroughSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
- Barrett/Canfield, LLC v. City of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- Angell Family 2012 Prouts Neck Trusts v. Town of Scarborough Kenyon C. Bolton III v. Town of ScarboroughSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.