People v. Law
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NICHOLSON, Acting P. J.
In People v. Monjaras (2008) 164 Cal.App.4th 1432 [79 Cal.Rptr.3d 926] (Monjaras), this court addressed an oft-raised attack on the sufficiency of the evidence when the prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence to prove that a defendant used a firearm to commit a criminal offense. Noting that circumstantial evidence suffices to establish the *979sentence enhancement imposed by Penal Code section 12022.53, subdivision (b),1 we conclusively rejected the contention and published our opinion “to say in no uncertain terms that a moribund claim like that raised by…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. MonjarasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- People v. EscobarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. Alsadi CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. ArellanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- People v. Medlock CA2/8California Court of Appeal · 2016
- People v. RosalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- People v. Weathers CA3California Court of Appeal · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.