Legal Opinion

Taylor v. King

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 26, 1914No. 8769PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Before Shipp, J., Action by George H. Taylor against Mrs. Lila O. King and others to foreclose a mortgage. From a judgment for plaintiff for an insufficient amount, he appeals. No evidence to support findings of fact: 51 S. C. 80S; 55 S. C. 198; 67 S. C. 541. Sufficiency of tender: 71 S. C. 250. Effect of tender: Code, sec. 3461. Attorney's fees: 71 S. C. 258; 50 S. C. 303; 84 S. C. 458. '

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was stated by

Mr. Justice Fraser.

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage given by Mrs. Lila O. King to the Loan & Exchange Bank on November 18, 1904, and duly assigned to the plaintiff. The case shows that “it is admitted by counsel that tender for $1,636.21 was made December 7, 1912.” The tender was refused because the appellant claimed that an installment of interest due in 1911 had not been paid. It is now admitted that the 1911 interest had been paid. It is claimed and not denied that Mrs. King had until January 1, 1913-, in which ' to pay the note. The appellant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Coley v. ColeySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Graves v. BurchWyoming Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Berry v. CaldwellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API